I am excited to be an Assistant Professor at the University of Central Oklahoma. I am currently teaching Business Analytics, Database Foundations, and Developing SQL Server Database.
I recently graduated with a Doctorate in Computer and Information Science at the University of Arkansas at Little Rock and I am primarily interested in the areas of privacy and usable security. My dissertation was "A Longitudinal Study of Privacy Awareness in the Digital Age and the Influence of Knowledge." You can see more information in the Research area of this website.
Having worked in the computer industry since 1979, I have held a number of positions, many of them as a link between technical and non-technical people helping each side to understand the other. Perhaps, because of this, I can easily see the need for usable technologies in the areas of privacy and security. A person shouldn’t have to understand the intricate details of a technology to be able to implement it in a home setting.
By happenstance, several years ago, I discovered that I really like teaching. Because of this, I chose to enroll in a PhD program. In the program, I have discovered that I enjoy research.
University of Central Oklahoma
University of Arkansas at Little Rock, Dr. Nitin Agarwal
University of Arkansas at Little Rock, Dr. Serhan Dagtas
Ph.D. in Computer and Information Science
University of Arkansas at Little Rock
Graduate Certificate in Applied Statistics
University of Arkansas at Little Rock
Master of Business Administration
University of Memphis
Bachelor of Science in Mathematics / Computer Science
University of Memphis
Currently, my research efforts are in the realm of Privacy and Confidentiality. How are Internet privacy policies perceived by users? What is the difference between privacy and confidentiality? How are these issues impacted by current and future technology?
I am also interested in these same issues in the context of social networking. How does a social network influence an individual's choice for privacy settings? How can a social network influence these choices?
I am involved in a research group working on quantifying the impact of cultural, organizational issues on the success of introducing information quality procedures into an organization. This group hopes to develop a System Dynamics model demonstrating this quantified impact. I would like to explore using Systems Dynamics modeling with privacy issues.
Check out my Google Scholar Profile here.
If you would like more information, click here.
This project was centered around the question "Do individuals read Internet privacy policies and why or why not?
This research group currently consists of Dr. John Talburt, Dr. Thomas Redman, David Becker, Donna Chacere and myself.
The use of social networking sites (SNS) such as Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube has contributed to improving teaching and learning in contemporary educational systems. Unfortunately, online social networks are among the many emerging technology artefacts that introduce new and potentially serious risks to academic environments and therefore have also been credited with the increased prevalence of academic cheating, or cyber-cheating, among students. Recent media attention has focused on how social media has added another medium that can facilitate many collective movements, such as recent uprisings in the Arab world. However, limited research focus has been afforded to the role SNS plays in the pervasiveness of cheating in non-Western cultural settings. Given the continuing growth in social media and advanced technologies, it is necessary to explore and understand academic cheating in the era of digital technology and cultural complexity.
In this research, we conduct a case study of ‘Tasribat’, a Facebook page that facilitates cyber-cheating among certain social groups of students in Morocco. Using an interpretive case study approach, we explore why students collectively engage in cyber-cheating. We leverage both interviews as well digital footprints to explore this collective cheating movement on Facebook. We focus on the intertwined relationship between individual and collective cyber-cheating behaviours with an emphasis on ethical and cultural complexity. The paper's major contribution resides in its analysis and conceptualisation through our emerging model—the Collective Action Cyber-Cheating Model—that integrates collective action and social learning theories. We conclude by discussing this study's contributions to research and practice and its associated future research opportunities.
While information and data quality practitioners are in general agreement that social, cultural, and organizational factors are the most important in determining the success or failure of an organization’s data quality programs, there is little to no existing research quantifying these factors. In this research we build from both our previous research and others’ to distill and clarify those cultural factors which are the Critical Cultural Success Factors (CCSFs) for successful Information and Data Quality programs in an organization. Using the Delphi method for gaining consensus from a group of experts, we distilled fourteen factors down to six and clarified the definitions of those six factors. We begin explaining how these CCSFs fit into Organizational Learning Theory and plan to ultimately define a new system dynamics model incorporating them so that organizations and information quality practitioners can positively affect the success of information and data quality programs.
Data Quality (DQ) is an important determiner of success for any organization to conduct its mission and meet its objectives. Organizations undertake initiatives to improve the quality of the data that drives value for the organization. Two studies led by the University of Arkansas at Little Rock (UALR) have identified a list of 6 clearly defined cultural factors for data quality initiatives that are considered critical to their success. A DQ initiative can be considered an organizational change initiative. Senge’s Dance of Change system dynamics model can be considered a framework for evaluating organizational change. This study explores how the Dance of Change model can be used as a framework for understanding the critical cultural success factors (CCSFs) generated by UALR’s previous Student Project and Delphi studies.
The authors survey and describe the accepted submissions to the Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS) since its inception in 2005. We observe some noteworthy trends in both the accepted papers and in the authorship of those papers while keeping historical views of the trends in mind. We aim to identify emerging topics of interests in the usable privacy and security domain. Furthermore, this investigation would shed insights on the academic vs. practitioners’ view on privacy and security especially with the proliferation of digital communication tools in the last decade that have engaged the society in profound debates on the corrosion of privacy.
Information and data quality practitioners are in general agreement that social, cultural, and organizational factors are the most important in determining the success or failure of an organization’s data quality programs. This paper presents some of the first research undertaken to substantiate these anecdotal claims. The paper describes a survey of recent graduates from the University of Arkansas at Little Rock Information Quality Graduate Program. In the survey the graduates rate how much influence these sociocultural factors had on the outcomes of their data quality projects. The results of the survey support the practitioners’ claims.
Privacy, in the modern connected world, has become a much discussed topic in society ranging from privacy concerns to impacts, attitudes, practices and technologies. Privacy policies are published by businesses and other organizations to communicate to individuals how their private information will be used. This research strives to answer the question – What are the current attitudes of individuals towards these published privacy policies and have those attitudes changed in the last ten years? The research in this paper is based on data collected from an online survey in spring 2014. Compared with research published by Annenberg Public Policy Center in 2005, somewhat surprisingly attitudes have not changed in the last decade.
Information quality is generally defined in terms of fitness for use. Almost all agree that they prefer high-quality to low-quality information. And, while many organizations have made good progress, many find that setting up information quality programs and making improvements proves difficult. Further, most agree that the most critical difficulties stem from organizational, structural and political issues. As yet, there is no body of theory and practice to help leaders and organizations systematically understand and address these issues.
This research program aims to (begin to) build the body of needed theory. The basic idea is to employ systems dynamics and computer simulation to explore the ways hundreds of possible factors and managerial actions advance or hinder information quality efforts. More specifically then, the long-term goal of this research is to create and utilize a test bed (or simulator) to examine, in a systematic fashion, the impact of various social/cultural issues which influence the penetration and overall success of information quality in an organization. In particular, building on the work of Falleta (1), this research is a literature review of multiple organizational change models that can potentially be utilized for this modeling.
This paper reports on one aspect of this research, namely, the literature review. As one might suspect, there is much relevant work, from the fields of systems dynamics, organizational analyses, force-field analyses, and change management.
There are many challenging issues in the field of Information Quality (IQ) and experience has taught us that they are not all technical. As Thomas Redman points out “Veterans also know that it is not the hard, technical issues that stymie an organization’s efforts to better manage and utilize its data and information assets, but rather the soft organizational, political, and social issues.” (Redman 2008, 159–160) Doan et al cite a similar issue with data integration, that many projects fail simply because the data owners do not want to cooperate (Doan, Halevy, and Ives 2012). Most current IQ methodologies and frameworks now acknowledge and incorporate this reality, for example, the McGilvray Framework for IQ posits that in addition to the what (data) and how (processes and technology) context, the who (people and organizations) must also be considered in order to effectively address IQ problems (McGilvray 2008).
I thoroughly enjoy teaching! I love to find new ways to explain topics so that everyone can understand. When I teach, I think I learn more than my students.
UALR Student Asks: Web Privacy — Do You Care? Arkansas Business, Dec 5, 2016
Privacy policies good for big business, not so good for consumers Science Daily, December 17, 2014
Provided classroom instruction including labs, met with students upon request and graded all work. Also frequently served as a substitute for various networking and business classes.
IT Manager
Responsibilities included information technology planning, management of staff, network administration, database administration and management, application programming, website programming, WAN and LAN security, disaster recovery, technical project management and participation in various state advisory working groups. These working groups have developed a certificate policy for a statewide implementation of PKI; multiple statewide technology policies including a password policy, wireless policy, encryption policy, data classification, records retention, and other statewide standards and best practices.
Provided business problem solving, application development and design, custom training, implementation and conversion services.
I was hired to assist with turning around an unsatisfied customer. Within six months, the customer was a reference account.
Network Integration Specialist
Project Manager for integration services with a multi-vendor perspective for several multi-million dollar implementations. Was first analyst in company to obtain Microsoft Certified Systems Engineer (MCSE)
Provided business problem solving, application development and design, custom training, implementation and conversion services.
Principal Systems Consultant
Responsible for achieving consulting goals, assisting Account Executive in execution of Marketing Plan, providing technical support to sales representative and customers, providing presentations and demonstrations of equipment and software. Received the Annual Circle of Excellence Award, Southern Region Support Analyst of the Month (twice), and was awarded Outstanding Performance in State Government.
Senior Systems Consultant
Responsible for providing technical support to sales representatives and customers, providing presentations and demonstrations of equipment and software. Also provided custom classroom training. Received the Annual Circle of Excellence twice.
Vice-President of a small startup software development company. Responsible for sales, customer support, development, and management.
Systems Engineer responsible for post-sales customer support on a new line of mini-computers. Included programming, operating systems maintenance and documentation.
![]() |
Webmaster for SBP-BRiMS Conference (http://sbp-brims.org/) 2016 - 2017 |
![]() |
Association for Information Systems |
![]() |
Association for Computing Machinery |
![]() |
International Association of Information and Data Quality (IAIDQ) (served on chapter Board of Directors) |
![]() |
(ISC)2 (International Information Systems Security Certification Consortium) |
![]() |
ISACA (formerly known as Information Systems Audit and Control Association) (served on chapter Board of Directors) |
![]() |
Arkansas InfraGard Member’s Alliance (served on Board of Directors) |
![]() |
Project Management Institute Central Arkansas Chapter |
![]() |
The Honor Society of Phi Kappa Phi |
![]() |
Delta Epsilon Iota Academic Honor Society |
Please feel free to email or call me if I can be of any assistance.
Download a Vcard (For Apple IOS 7+, use Safari)